Wednesday, April 15, 2009

Websites: The Great Equalizer or More of the Same?


Since our discussion last Monday, I have not been able to get one thing that was mentioned out of my head. It was the question of whether or not this new "cyber-real estate" known as websites even the playing field for the little guy, or if this new platform for information will become a mirror of it's former physical incarnation, with Big Business equipped and eager to push us out.

Amber made a great point. The Internet used to be kind of underground, populated by the young and web-savvy. Is the Wild West being tamed by established profiteers building high-rises on our Main Street - our native soil? All right, I'm obsessed with this unoriginal real estate metaphor, but I'm rolling with it.

Let's go about this question logically...

If the Internet is the new business center, in theory, we all start out on an equal platform. There is no Beverly Hills on the Internet. There is no Torrance on the Internet. Everybody has the same "location, location, location": www.

On the other hand, it could be argued that the quality and memorability of a domain name is the new geography. Do the big boys have an advantage there? The Domain Name Rights Coalition (yes, you read that right) thinks they do.

The second thing to consider is what is built on your cyber-property. Free of the expense of "brick and mortar," can the cash-strapped entrepreneur build as effective a website as his big money competitor? I would argue "yes." Young revolutionaries (too much?) like Tim Westergen (Pandora), Shawn Fanning (Napster), andTom Anderson (MySpace) have proven it is possible. Money can't always buy innovation. Score one for the little guy/gal.

I will discuss only two more things: "Content" & "Maintaining an Open Web", so bear (bare?) with me...

As far as content, there is no doubt in my mind that small businesses can provide just as quality a product as the big boys. But can they match the breadth and quantity of sources and contributors - MAYBE! One of the great things about the Internet is that is - by nature - viral. As words spread expontentially about a site, people interested in similar things congregate, often creating a digital headquarters for experts in a given field - not compiled by a Human Resources department, but created organically through shared interests and expertise.

It is this concept of an "open Internet" that allows us, as the majority start-ups, to gain a foothold in an arena in which we would otherwise be unable to compete. This open, sharing, Semantic Web works in a way that is pretty much antithetical to the corporate mentality. But if
Blogger "Some Random Dude" is right, we may be winning the battle!

I can't pretend to wrap my head around this stuff, and I seem to have come up with more questions than answers in this post. But I think it is an interesting, relevant topic that merits more discussion..

What do you guys think?

Tuesday, March 3, 2009

Former WSJ Editor Looks to the Future


Check out this article about a speech given in the University of MontanaPaul Steiger, former managing editor of the Wall Street Journal.

Tuesday, February 24, 2009

The Daily Show with Ben Franklin

SOME NOTABLE JOURNALISTS WHO USED HUMOR:

(click on their name or image for more info)

Sunday, February 15, 2009

My New Canadian Friend, Eh?

I like the way this kid thinks. It's a long but interesting read about the role of humor in the news... from Bryan Adams country!

Humor and Journalism
It's worth the time to read it.

I like this quote:
"Delivering the information that people need to be part of
their government should be the journalistic craft’s first goal. How that
delivery is accomplished is of very little consequence."

Well, speak of the devil..


MSNBC reports on a new survey that says more is required of journalists than ever before!

"PWR New Media Releases New Journalist Survey Highlighting Changing Role of Media in Today's Economy"

Going Solo Down Under

With unending lay-offs plaguing journalism (in the states and globally), it is no secret that people are now doing their jobs as well as the jobs of employees-past. More work for the same pay. Happy not to be one of the statistics, most journalists are trying to embrace this "one-man (or woman) show" mentality of media outlet owners and management.

This shift in journalism knows no borders and spans all mediums...

The following link is an article about Australian Dateline solo journalists.

Click here for the article.

Saturday, February 14, 2009

Finally some good news for young journalists...

Check out this guy! He has some logical and optimistic advice for young journalists. At the same time, I think he is naive to believe that older journalists cannot adapt.



Friday, February 13, 2009

"A Teeming Swamp of Considerations" - John Carroll


John Carroll lays it down.

This is from a speech on Monday...


CLICK ME

Thursday, February 12, 2009

CBS Twitter Interview Clip

3% have computers globally

30% have mobile devices

The Twitterfication of journalism...

Sunday, February 8, 2009

Maybe you should be paying for this link...


Maybe I should have to pay a nickel to use this logo...

For those who haven't seen it yet - it seems like a pretty reasonable assessment and proposed solution...


The Time Magazine article on saving journalism is here.

Saturday, February 7, 2009

The Good Ol' Days

This old journalism film is classic...

If only they knew...


Tuesday, February 3, 2009

Citizen Journalism Takes a Hit

As of February 6, 2009, the website Scoopt.com, which was designed for users to upload newsworthy photographs, will be closed to the public.

Citizen journalism gets a swift one in the groin.

Check it out here.

Could This Be Where the Industry is Headed?!

I found an interesting piece that was just posted on U.S. News and World Report's website.

Read it here. Don't worry - it's very brief.

It is an interview with Steven Kydd, Executive Vice President of Demand Media and owner of eHow.com, which pays contributing writers based partly on how much ad revenue their articles generate.

While the articles on eHow.com may not fall into the category of "traditional journalism," the business model employed by this company is worth examining...

.
.. and maybe you can make some extra cash to pay .0001 percent of your student loans!

Friday, January 30, 2009

Tweet Tech



An intriguing discussion about the benefits of "new journalism"...

Twitter Blog

Wednesday, January 21, 2009

Community Journalism



We discussed the idea of the role of community in journalism the other day.


This MIT professor has some good points...

Click Here

If it sparks your interest, make sure to check out Part II - more great stuff.

Jester Journalism

By Tom Sparks

The more I thought about our discussion last week about the changing media, the more I realized that I was not completely forthcoming in my explanation of how I like to get my news. As some of you may recall, I cited my favorite source of news as my daily "paper" newspaper. Sure, I get a newspaper everyday, skim the headlines most mornings and actually sit down to read the thing on the weekends. In fact, physical newspapers probably do account for the majority of news that I digest in a week. But is that how I like to get my news? Not really.

Like many young people nowadays, I love to watch "Daily Show with Jon Stewart" and "The Colbert Report" with Stephen Colbert on cable station Comedy Central. You may remember the Pew Research Center survey that came out last year that found that more 18-to-24-year-olds get there news from Jon Stewart than all three networks evening news programs combined.

"And just what," I ask, "is wrong with that?"

Some might point to a liberal bias in these programs, claiming the arguably democratic slant creates a skewed perspective on national and global events and allows the hosts to hide personal bias behind the cloak of comedy. Some see the information presented in these programs as minimal, with too much time afforded to the punchlines, as opposed to maintaining a greater focus on deeper aspects of each story. Still others are resistant to getting their news from shows that proudly boast the fact that they are providing "fake news."

On the other hand, these programs bring news to young people in an easily digestible, even "fun" format. As news sources become more diverse and accessible through a growing presence on the Internet and consistently improving mobile technology, news gatherers face more competition for public attention than at any other time in history.

According to Bill Kovach and Tom Rosenstiel in 2000's "The Elements of Journalism,"

"Part of a journalist's responsibility... is not just providing information but also providing it in such a way that people will be inclined to listen."

Jon Stewart and Stephen Colbert have new generations "listening." Less a fad than a trend, these "jester journalists" have created an "infotainment" formula that works, and I predict there will be many more of these hybrid programs emerging in years to come.

Do I mind? Not really.

Sunday, January 18, 2009

Interesting Article About "The Future of Journalism"

The San Francisco Bay Guardian ran an interesting year-end retrospective regarding journalism. (I'm NorCal guy)

Here's the address:

http://www.sfbg.com/entry.php?entry_id=7772&catid=&volume_id=398&issue_id=412&volume_num=43&issue_num=14

I really have to learn how to add a link to another site on this thing...